The Latest ADAC Summer Tire Test Shows Only Three Models Earning Top Marks
The German automobile club ADAC recently conducted a comprehensive evaluation of summer tires in the popular 225/50 R17 size, testing a total of 16 different models in collaboration with other European auto organizations. This rigorous assessment prioritized balanced performance, emphasizing that excelling in one area alone does not guarantee overall success. Safety on wet and dry roads carried significant weight, while factors like durability, fuel efficiency, noise levels, and environmental impact also played key roles in the final ratings. Only three tires managed to secure the highest recommendation level, standing out for their consistent strengths across multiple disciplines.
Continental PremiumContact 7 emerged as the clear leader with an impressive overall score. It delivered exceptional braking and handling on both dry and wet surfaces, contributing to top-tier driving safety. The tire also showed strong efficiency, helping keep fuel consumption low, though it was slightly noisier than some competitors. Its predicted longevity and relatively low tire wear added to its appeal, making it a well-rounded choice for drivers seeking reliability in varied conditions.
Pirelli Cinturato, often referred to as the C3 variant in discussions, claimed the second spot among the elite group. This model shone in wet performance and offered solid durability, providing confident handling even in challenging situations. It balanced safety with respectable efficiency and environmental considerations, proving that premium tires can deliver without major compromises. Drivers who prioritize grip and long-term value will find much to appreciate here.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 rounded out the top three, earning praise for its outstanding predicted mileage and minimal wear. It performed admirably across safety categories, though it showed minor limitations in aquaplaning resistance compared to the leaders. Its efficiency helped reduce fuel use, and the overall package made it particularly suitable for those who cover high annual distances. These three premium options, typically priced around 160 dollars per tire, justified their cost through superior all-around results.
Many other tires received a solid recommendation but fell short of the top tier due to specific weaknesses. For instance, Bridgestone Turanza 6 and Michelin Primacy 5 stood out for excellent longevity and low rolling resistance, aiding fuel savings, yet they lagged slightly in dry handling. Models like Falken Ziex ZE320 and Kumho Ecsta HS52 offered good value with strong wet capabilities, but they carried drawbacks in noise or sustainability. Budget-oriented choices often struggled more noticeably, particularly in dry braking or overall durability.
The weakest performers included options like Linglong Sport Master, which surprisingly posted the best wet braking distance in the group yet suffered from poor dry performance, high wear, and elevated environmental impact. Similarly, tires such as Leao Nova-Force Acro and Lassa Revola showed deficiencies in handling and lifespan, earning only partial recommendations. These results highlight the risks of opting for the cheapest alternatives, as compromises in key safety areas can affect everyday driving confidence.
ADAC stressed the importance of equilibrium in tire design over specialization in a single category. The test underscored how premium models often provide the best security and efficiency for most drivers, especially in mixed weather typical of summer months. Choosing a tire with strong wet and dry capabilities, combined with good mileage, tends to offer the greatest peace of mind on the road.
What summer tire experiences have you had, and which model would you pick based on these results? Share your thoughts in the comments.
